
Share
9th October 2015
08:46am BST

'I hope that this research helps us understand ourselves better and why we are the way we are.'
While the study is certainly intriguing, the method is still more than 30 per cent inaccurate, leading many experts in the field to take the findings with a pinch of salt.
Prof Darren Griffin, Professor of Genetics at the University of Kent said he waits "with baited breath" for a full peer-reviewed article: “While there is strong evidence in general for a biological basis for homosexuality my personal impression has always been one of a multiple contributory factors, including life experiences." he said. “My gut feeling it that, as the complete story unfolds, the association may not be quite as simple as suggested. “To claim a 70 per cent predictive value of something as complex as homosexuality is bold indeed." Speaking to New Scientist, Dr. Ngun himself revealed he has concerns that the test has the potential to be abused. “I’m gay,” he says, “and I’ve always wondered why I am the way I am. But once you have this information, you can’t control how it’s used or disseminated.” Do you believe environmental factors can affect a person's sexuality? Join the conversation on Twitter @HerFamilydotie.