Well, I'm not gonna start throwing any stones for one thing.
As a mum to two relatively normal/on the larger side of normal newborns (weighing in at 8lbs and 8lbs 5oz respectively) - I know well how rapidly little ones can gain weight and grow.
Because by the four-month mark, my babies were definitely 'sturdy'. They became sturdy toddlers too - and strangers and family and friends alike would regularly comment on how 'robust and healthy' they were for their age.
Nadda bother. I took it as a compliment. And anyway, the older one (now aged five) levelled out eventually and I've no reason to think her two-and-a-half year old brother will be any different.
However, even I can identify that Stormi - the daughter of Kylie Jenner - is all things sturdy, robust,
and healthy.
So much so, in fact, that some folk are saying
she can't possible be a February baby.
Ms Jenner, 20, posted a snap on Sunday on her Instagram - where she has some 109m followers (standard, like).
And, well, in response plenty of people had an opinion on the matter.
"Sixteen weeks old? That bay is practically big enough to go to school," stated one, with another answering simply: "That baby is way too big to be just 4 months old.
Somebody else offered: "Yeah, Stormi is definitely older than 4 months. I think they're trying to hide that Travis is not the father."
Meanwhile, this commentator opted for: "Trying to hide that she never was pregnant fooling the masses. Kylie was never pregnant and will never be pregnant."
OK, so our head is spinning with the conspiracy theories.
We've no reason whatsoever to think that Stormi isn't the child of Kylie and her rapper boyf Travis Scott... but what do you guys reckon?
