
Share
20th September 2019
11:56pm BST

The Baby Biome study, conducted by researchers from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, UCL, the University of Birmingham and their collaborators, stressed that the exact role of the baby's gut bacteria remains unclear, and that it is yet unknown whether or not these differences at birth will have any long-term consequences.
Carrying our their research, the UK scientists examined 1,679 samples of gut bacteria from 596 babies and 175 mothers for the study, which was published in Nature. Faecal samples were taken from babies aged four days, seven days or 21 days, after they were delivered in UK hospitals naturally or by Caesarean.
Maybe unsurprisingly when you consider the way they come into the world, the study found that babies delivered naturally had many more health-associated bacteria from their mothers than babies who were born by Caesarean.
Here is what Dr Nigel Field, clinical associate professor at UCL, had to say about the research:
"Babies are sterile when they are in the womb," Field explains. "And the moment they are born is the moment when the immune system has a huge number of bacteria that is it presented with. And so the hypothesis is that the moment of birth might be a sort of thermostat moment which sets the immune system for future life."
Possibly due to this difference in gut bacteria, the study showed that babies born by C-section have a slightly higher risk of immune-related conditions, explains Field. They also have a slightly higher risk of asthma, inflammatory bowel disease and other allergic conditions.
"The first weeks of life are a critical window of development of the baby's immune system, but we know very little about it," Professor Peter Brocklehurst of the University of Birmingham, who led the study, said to Sky News.
"We urgently need to follow up this study, looking at these babies as they grow to see if early differences in the microbiome lead to any health issues."
Explore more on these topics: