
Share
30th May 2022
08:30am BST

She also points out that children's right to privacy and safety were being breached without their consent, and often for financial gain.
"Without picking one example - and that wouldn’t actually be fair because I think a bit of responsibility has to be taken by the social media companies themselves and by the companies that use these parents - but certainly there would be tales of children being clearly unhappy or tired or not in the mood and yet it has become their job to promote a product or endorse a product or whatever,” Lynch said.
“These children are doing work and because they’re young, they can’t actually consent to that. Their privacy can sometimes be violated and there is a whole ethical minefield around it.”
Lynch argues that legislation can be tricky.
“So yes, I would say there needs to be tighter legislation around it. It needs to be clear because very often it is presented within the sort of cushion of family life and the segue between what is family life and what is an ad isn’t always very clear."
She adds:
“There needs to be more transparency really about transactions that go on in the background.”
"There is a major issue around child safety when so much person l information is being shared. The primary concern would be the safety of the child because once a child becomes recognisable separate to the parent then there’s the potential for them to become a bit of a target,” she said.
“When you think about how much is shared about these children online, it is pretty easy to know who their siblings are, what their date of birth is, when they lost their last tooth, what their pet’s name is. There is a so much information out there about certain children and there are huge safety concerns around that then as well.”